Systems Design Case Study

AI Workflow Orchestration Platform

Designing a modular, observable system for orchestrating AI workflows, balancing flexibility, reliability, and cost control across models and execution contexts.

Role: Full Stack / Systems Design
Focus: AI orchestration, reliability, cost control
Scope: Workflow engine, APIs, async execution

The Problem

Teams wanted to build AI-powered features: document generation, summarization, classification, automation—but ad-hoc scripts and single-call APIs quickly broke down as complexity increased.

Hardcoded prompts, limited observability, and tight coupling between UI and model logic made systems brittle, expensive, and difficult to evolve.

Constraints

  • • Multiple model backends (local and hosted)
  • • Long-running or multi-step workflows
  • • Cost awareness per execution
  • • Safe handling of user inputs and outputs
  • • Observability without leaking sensitive data
  • • Prompt iteration without redeploying applications

Architecture Concept

AI interactions are treated as workflows, not direct model calls. UI never talks directly to models—it talks to workflows.

Key Decisions

Workflow graphs over single prompts

Graph-based workflows allow steps to be modified, reordered, or replaced without rewriting consuming applications.

Model-agnostic orchestration

Workflows define capabilities, not vendors, allowing models to be swapped based on cost, availability, or performance.

Async execution by default

AI calls are unpredictable in duration. Background execution enables retries, recovery, and non-blocking UX.

Prompt iteration as configuration

Prompts and parsing logic live in workflow definitions, not application code—allowing rapid iteration without redeploys.

Explicit inputs and outputs

Strict schemas prevent silent failures and hallucinated structure from leaking into downstream systems.

Tradeoffs Considered

Option Outcome
Direct LLM calls from UI Rejected (tight coupling, poor observability)
One workflow per feature Rejected (duplication and drift)
Vendor-locked SDKs Rejected (cost and portability risk)

Outcome

The system treats AI as infrastructure, not magic.